Negative values.

[joacobanfield]

In HD0 you could make the enemy base go into negative.
How much negatives was your maximum?
Mine was -42.

[DEEP SPACE]

HD0? Do you mean HD1?

Quick summary:

HD = HD1
HD:S = HD1.5
HD:X = HD2
HD:? (Still no name) = HD3

BTW, I once with a MT fleet maked that the enemy based went to "minus" than -200.

[Wv_Hawk_vW]

i think he's referring to hd0 as HD Classic, as though it were a beta of the other HS's, while HD:S is 1, the first non-beta of the others; HD:X is 2, and HD:3 is, well, HD:3.

[joacobanfield]

i refer to the oldest one.
Wow, -50 with no big buffs.

[Wv_Hawk_vW]

I will try to hide my shame.

[Greywing]

HD0 doesn't have much of an AI A lot of stuff is just random, only a very few cards have an actual AI.

[Wv_Hawk_vW]

HD0 doesn't have much of an AI A lot of stuff is just random, only a very few cards have an actual AI.

What about spectrum? How much AI does it have? How much time did you spend on it?

[Greywing]

HDs is the first version of the Ai that was improved in HDx. It's not as detailed and on top of that HDs didn't have as much abilities as HDx, so there was less AI code to begin with. I don't remember how much time i spent on it. HDx was more than a week worth of 12 hours a day for the core of the AI, which was balanced and updated several times after that.

[Wv_Hawk_vW]

HDs is the first version of the Ai that was improved in HDx. It's not as detailed and on top of that HDs didn't have as much abilities as HDx, so there was less AI code to begin with. I don't remember how much time i spent on it. HDx was more than a week worth of 12 hours a day for the core of the AI, which was balanced and updated several times after that.

Are you sure you improved it, and that you didn't simply update it? HDs actually seems slightly smarter than HDx.